On January 22, 2011 conference organized by the Civic List "Another city is possible" has achieved its goal by imposing on Plans Integrated urban planning and a useful comparison and passionate, both in the majority among the opposition forces.
The priority is identified by everyone in the long list of public works in St. Marinella needs, both primary infrastructure (roads, sewers, sidewalks ....) And secondary infrastructure (schools, nursery schools, city hall, auditorium, public parks, access to the sea ....), But where to find resources if local are becoming more impoverished? Here the use of integrated plans or construction agreed is presented as inevitable.
The PRC believes that the Integrated Plan is a painful choice because it means, in any case, increases in space requirements compared to the Plan. Furthermore, it is not always a good sacrifice. Let us ask ourselves: It is a verification compliance commitments already made by individuals and never honored? What assurances has been the City to see fulfilled? Otherwise penalties will be paid? Everyone can understand that if you can not get what was agreed by individuals, is not any reason to use the integrated plan. A check with the technical departments is ruling on the commitments made in any new agreement with the employers, used to circumvent the terms and timing.
Secondly: the first to declare that there are public resources, has attempted to ask the City and County Region funds for urban regeneration (recovery plans)? Environmental restoration projects presented to the State and the European Community? Over the past three years, all the contributions due to the City by citizens to state concessions, occupation of public property, concession fees for the building, Bucalossi were collected? It also has the City adequately those contributions to offset the cuts to Local Government?
Instead of verifying the above, there are those who will hasten to say that the works from public to private demand should not necessarily fall on private land adjacent to the intervention but may also be placed away from them. The statement objective is motivated by the observation that in districts of S. Marinella degraded saturated already and permanently compromised, the scope for further urbanization no longer exists. So we should allow the private building elsewhere.
The Circle of the PRC believes that the consequences of this procedure is the creation of new realities of poor services, multiplying the state of deterioration. The purpose of planning is however the rehabilitation and retraining, not to create new realities to heal (maybe with Integrated Plans, in an infinite process).
Proceed to the general variant of the Master Plan in the first instance of finally focusing attention on all infrastructure that the community really need, and secondly you should look for resources to not give in to blackmail to turn entrepreneur and thirdly you should expect from the private services they have promised, but, as in Prato Sea, have not yet realized.
Circle of PRC "Benedetti Michelangeli" of S. Marinella