Landro - The Council Chamber Group "Support Landriano" brought forward the protest had already begun during the last session of the City Council, not showing up in block to meeting held Wednesday, November 28. At the sitting of September, the child had left the classroom after impetuousness speech by the Mayor that he had silenced Aguzzi, badly, Councillor Stephen Pent who was preparing to do an intervention. Pent So, unable to continue the exposition, he left the assembly room, followed by the whole minority group.
"This attitude of the Mayor Aguzzi, which are repeated so frequently," - continues the release of the minority - "demonstrate his inability to properly manage the conduct of the City Council. Precisely for this reason we have repeatedly stressed the need to provide the administration of an appropriate regulation of the City Council. Without this tool the only thing that is guaranteed is the total absence of democracy during the course of the meeting held: as a minority does not feel the least protected rights of our directors and, therefore, the rights of all citizens who voted for us. For this reason, as a sign a strong position, determined, conscious and coherent, with respect to a situation became unbearable, we decided to abstain from the latter event in the City Council. " The Minority
challenges, first, the centralization of the role of Mayor and Chairman of the Board in the same person, "Aguzzi proves to be manifestly inappropriate to the role of coordinator and" impartial arbiter "We have been repeatedly forced to witness scenes the Mayor who beats his fists on the table, the directors of the Minority insults with impunity, unfair advantage of his position of power to make statements that are beyond the topics covered, screaming with the air contorted as if he had lost control of himself. Imagine how it is possible, with these attitudes, retain control of the Council and ensure the proper and democratic development. In these circumstances, continuing to leave the conduct of the City Council to the free will of the Mayor, it destroys every principle of democracy and undermines the significance of this important moment in the political life of the country. "
Another very significant is the lack of regulation of the City Council, despite the minority he requested the establishment for years and despite the existence of a specially constituted Committee on Rules and, unfortunately, fall into oblivion for almost a year: "The deafness of the Mayor Aguzzi our requests, to provide the Municipality of the City Council's Regulations, shall submit any discussion of free will, without rules, the union: the lack of balance and equidistance of the Mayor demonstrates the inability of the role of political undress and get in to the President. For these reasons we believe that should be taken seriously a hypothesis that we had already advanced, quietly and in a very informal, with an occurrence of the first excesses: that the Mayor take note of the situation and pass the baton to his trusted advisor to replace him in his role as President of the Municipal Council, obviously done very quickly after the revision of the statute to that effect and consequently the drafting by the Commission of a good regulation to be approved by the Council itself. We believe that this would be an act of great responsibility and authority that could restore credibility to a figure who, for his questionable conduct institutionally, is certainly not offering an image of honorable self. " The Minority
says, finally, of having already done so to advance to numerous reports of how various institutional attitudes and the work of the Mayor Aguzzi, many members of the majority and the administration in general make activity, affecting the minority can not, therefore, the principles of democratic government. "The problem, in fact, it was evident from the very first meetings of the council:" - comment on the advisers of the Minority - "several times in these three years in office we have taken action to invite the Mayor to moderate tones and a fall in fees debate, however lively and participatory, it must remain fair and democratic. Even the majority of advisers, at times, feel compelled to intervene to curb the excesses of the first citizen. Unfortunately, the inertia in the face of the Prefecture of Pavia to our complaints and our continuous and insistent reminders We wonder how can a citizen to have confidence in the institutions even when we Councillors, that we should be popular representatives, we are not heard by specially appointed bodies? Once again we see the sad proof that you can escape the law without which no action is taken. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment