Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Ideas For Hot Buffet At Wedding

prepare all'ecatombe. Hopefully.

This article appeared on Repubblica.it is quite interesting. Describes the flaws that are coming out in the Democratic Party. And those are definitely tell a small part. Of course, the most newsworthy and highly effective media (Bologna, Reggio Emilia - the feud red par excellence! - And Forlì), but a small part. If you pass under a microscope to analyze the situation on the ground as it turns out the Democratic Party is in disarray in feuds once common to the core. And I would say "less evil".

The project is failing. And this comes from someone who believed and still believe it. Very. In this year and a half has been just as capable of being (Us) wrong. About everything. It is not the fault of the base. It is the fault of managers. Walter was also a butterfly will be carefree and optimistic, a Nano Arcore gutless (and Arcore) but at least he had important political idea, bring chaos to the Italian political combination that is found in all democracies are more efficient: reformist vs. conservative . Sure, mistakes have been made mainly by Walter also own (Di Pietro to accept that presented itself as an ally, thus overcoming the barrier, rather than make it disappear with all the other small parties has been an act of pure political myopia that caused only strengthening of a fake left-wing party which is Italy of values \u200b\u200band a dizzying collapse of what was to be the strong party of the grid, indeed the only party, the only interlocutor. Chain reaction that led also to an increase in votes for the UDC, unthinkable!) But at the end of the line that seems to have won is that of the politicians and most treacherous double agents such as D'Alema. And it is this line that the base does not understand. The words of Deborah Serracchiani circles during the conference, words that have become a new media phenomenon internett, were very clear. And shared. The party must change and change must do so from the bottom.

Change from the bottom does not mean that managers will be smaller than local, are promoted to a position at the provincial level and so on. No. Even local officials affected by seniority (we call it?) Of D'Alema, Bersani, Bindi, Marini and all the others. Change from below is to change all their leaders from the bottom up. Going down in the small, in the province: as you can reapply in Sassuolo Pattuzzi as an inept government after five years of flaws, the backroom of a bogus plan that was presented in the province not the same as actually voted in the municipal council so that did not meet the agreed parameters and favored the (too) cement to fatten the usual suspects? But we're kidding? Why should we continue to have the usual politicians - whose names, both nationally and territorially, are known to all - occupy the same seats since the PCI and DC? Just because their lives have never held a job that was not that of politics? The politics is not a job. The policy is to serve the other term, that the mandate that citizens have donated to the person in charge. The mandate, in any democracy worthy of respect is just in time, and especially non-renewable indefinitely. Otherwise you are in an oligarchy or a dictatorship worse. But on the other hand, the "old comrades" were raised on bread and "dictatorship of the proletariat" so it is quite impossible to imagine that they can understand the term "democracy of" and all that it entails, first of all the other things, the withdrawal from public life after the end of its electoral mandate). If your work is that the politician is something wrong. This does not mean that we should not make political life, but you should not live with the policy. And I intend to live the primary livelihood of an individual. If we survive (a term deliberately erroneous standard of living as a politician, even local) with the policy is revealed to us only as pests. And in Sassuolo, for example, parasites, left, in the Democratic Party, there are many, too many. As is well known to anyone, not pests do the body good. Kill him. And these parasites are killing the Democratic Party not only at national level but especially at local level.

It promises a massacre. At least I hope so. I hope they lose. And you lose bad. Masochism is not left this. No, indeed! I live with the hope that the carnage, a beating, like Bologna, Reggio but also here in Sassuolo, serve to demonstrate to the parasites that it is time to let go, to become adults and get a job ( yes, even in times of economic crisis, especially in times of economic crisis). And I hope that the carnage, wiping out the parasites, off to give the new figures, mostly from low. Yet I know that despite everything, although it might lose badly, perhaps the only ones to escape will always be the usual pests, now so strongly attached to the body where they may be now be the only masters.

God forbid.

Sunday, March 15, 2009

How Do I Quickly Defrost Sausages

end-of Work: always been a flop for the administration Aguzzi.

The worst way to administer public, draws to a close this mandate of the Aguzzi.
The recent and widespread controversy over the cutting of a historic row of trees in the center of the country, that angered minority, ecologists, but above the town commemorates both a scandal on the eve of the last election. Probably pressed by the need to give citizenship to the "sweetener" pre-election, it is customary for the team of directors in office at the City of Landriano, start of public works hastily conclude that, as time has proved, in blatant " flop. All dependent, of course, citizens and municipal finance.
The parallel between the work undertaken hurried along Via Milano, for the formation of a cycle track and the layout of the bank of the Canal Bolognini, and those executed, at the time, Piazza Guido Rossa is striking: work started in end of term, conducted with the utmost haste to deliver the work before the elections and are characterized by deficiencies, errors, defects and unacceptable. For jobs
Via Milano were hastily killed many trees for decades, that could be saved, as shown by the photos released by the administrator of the project itself, ruined the roadway and sidewalks for the use of heavy vehicles was not properly handled; damaged water pipes, which have forced several times to interrupt the supply of drinking water caused a dangerous situation for citizenship, as during the work, has not been prepared any site and any security measures to protect workers and those who journeyed on the spot.
almost a perfect analogy to what happened with Piazza Guido Rossa: after it was used for many months, as a repository of hundreds of cubic meters of land by the municipality itself, was given back to citizenship, in the period of the last local elections, due to fast pace and tight with which the work was conducted just before the election. This way of performing the work has led, of course, the result is now plain for everyone: heavy deficit design, lacking actions and very little attention to maintenance. The courses have an absurd gap, ending even in the grass and by convincing users to come up with alternative steps between the flower beds planted. The same pathways are difficult to practicability, for steep slopes and slippery in some sections. These conditions, which make it difficult for the enjoyment of this vast urban green space for wheelchairs or people with reduced mobility, contrary to the requirements of the law on architectural barriers in public places. The fountain, the center of design, raises some concerns because it is dangerously flush with the plane of the avenue and the administration's attempts to secure them by filling it with rocks, does not seem particularly happy. Even the experiment of planting a vegetation consisting by aquatic plants became a total failure, because all the plants withered absurdly, because of lack of water in the tub.
Surely the lack of lighting is an unacceptable failure in a design from scratch and it has favored the appearance of graffiti on the walls in stone in the center of the square.
The absence of litter bins, which the Administration has tried to remedy only several months after the inauguration, was a symptom of superficiality and neglect that have characterized this intervention.
Finally, the irrigation system had heavy inefficiencies: a few months of operation, some nozzles watered the street, instead of grass.
Evidently some people do not learn from mistakes ... nothing